![]() Nirvana’s legal team also argued that Eden had previously cashed in on being the “Nirvana baby.” They added that anyone who had a copy of the album would “on Elden’s theory guilty of felony possession of child pornography.” “Elden’s claim that the photograph on the ‘Nevermind’ album cover is ‘child pornography’ is, on its face, not serious,” Nirvana’s lawyers said. Elden filed a suit against the estate of Kurt Cobain and Nirvana’s surviving members, Dave Grohl and Krist Novoselic, last year. In the motion to dismiss, which was filed two weeks ago, Nirvana claimed Elden’s allegations lacked merit and smelled like an “absurd” cash grab. ![]() If he misses the deadline, the case will be dismissed without prejudice and closed. The judge dismissed the case “with leave to amend” - meaning Elden and his lawyers have until Jan. 30 deadline to file a response to Nirvana’s motion to dismiss. ![]() Olguin threw out the case late Monday after Elden missed his Dec. Spencer Elden, now 30, filed the lawsuit against against Kurt Cobain’s estate and Nirvana’s surviving members last year - accusing them of sexual exploitation and child pornography.Įlden claimed the artwork constituted child sexual abuse and that he’d suffered “lifelong damage” from having his naked body plastered on the album cover.įederal Judge Fernando M. Kurt Cobain’s ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’ guitar could nab $800K at auctionĪ California judge on Monday tossed a lawsuit filed against Nirvana by the man who appeared as a naked baby on the cover of their breakthrough album “Nevermind.” No apologies: Judge tosses ‘Nevermind’ baby’s child porn case against Nirvana ![]() Smells like more court dates: Nirvana cover baby appeals judge’s child porn dismissal Hindu, Buddhist leaders complain about ‘very painful’ NY beer ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |